I don't agree with hunting anything for sport. If you hunt something, you better eat it.Granted she lives in Montana, but I wouldn't hunt wolves for sport. They only need to be culled if they start attacking things other than wild prey. Fish and Wildlife officials are pretty good at managing their numbers so they don't starve or spread disease.
Really, all three animals will only attack if they feel threatened or are desperate for food.Wolves don't even attack and kill humans as much as bears and mountain lions do, so I'm not sure how this can be justified in the first place.
I agree, but the only animal I would be worried about in the wild would be a Mountain Lion, because even though Bears attack more people than Wolves do, they still kill less people than Mountain Lions.Really, all three animals will only attack if they feel threatened or are desperate for food.
Mountain lions tend to live the closest to people as well which is a big factor in attacks. And they will get PISSED if you are anywhere near their kids.I agree, but the only animal I would be worried about in the wild would be a Mountain Lion, because even though Bears attack more people than Wolves do, they still kill less people than Mountain Lions.
Good. Lock her up with wolves.
If you don't know the difference between a wolf and a husky, you shouldn't be allowed to hunt.Good. Lock her up with wolves.
Completely agreeIf you don't know the difference between a wolf and a husky, you shouldn't be allowed to hunt.