Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Help
Smilies
BB Codes
Trophies
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Forums
Dragon Ball
Dragon Ball Universe
If they were to "redo" GT, what would you keep as canon?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustafar Reginald" data-source="post: 14578" data-attributes="member: 113"><p>The interesting thing with this question is Super. Like, if this question was "if you were in charge of GT, what would you keep in" my answers would be very different but the way it's phrased, I can't keep anything in GT that's going to contradict Super. Because than my version of GT is riddled with plot-holes than contradict what's been established. Basically what I'm getting at here, is that as cool as Super Saiyan Four, and Super Saiyan Four Goku is a rad as hell design, if we were to make do it now and make it canon, I wouldn't include it. Because it's existence doesn't necessarily contradict canon mind you, but it's just like at this point, what purpose does it serve? Like Goku has Super Saiyan God and Ultra Instinct, even if I kept him being a kid, he would still have access to them. At least base God form, Blue would be too draining for Kiddie Goku but I don't think the others would be. Super Saiyan Four is probably my favourite thing to come out of GT but it just doesn't make sense in a canon world where Goku and Vegeta both have objectively better transformations available.</p><p></p><p>But as for what I'd keep, the concepts. GT has great concepts, literally every saga has a fantastic concept. The first arc having them traveling across multiple planets in search of Dragon Balls is such a cool concept, because Dragon Ball has some great alien species, there's a lot you could do with different planets and species to make it interesting. The problem was the execution. Baby is a fantastic concept. His history with the Saiyans, he ability to possess people's bodies, such a cool concept. I found the arc to be slog and couldn't get through it. The problem was the execution. Super 17 is unsalvageable, terrible concept. The Shadow Dragons, enemies spawned from the overuse of the Dragon Ball where each tied to like a wish made throughout the series, probably the greatest concept you could think of to bring the Dragon Ball Saga to a close. But from what I saw, outside of some cool moments with Omega Shenron, the problem was the execution.</p><p></p><p>Although shit, with the Super Dragon Balls that whole Shadow Dragon arc might not make sense anymore so I don't actually know if I could keep it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustafar Reginald, post: 14578, member: 113"] The interesting thing with this question is Super. Like, if this question was "if you were in charge of GT, what would you keep in" my answers would be very different but the way it's phrased, I can't keep anything in GT that's going to contradict Super. Because than my version of GT is riddled with plot-holes than contradict what's been established. Basically what I'm getting at here, is that as cool as Super Saiyan Four, and Super Saiyan Four Goku is a rad as hell design, if we were to make do it now and make it canon, I wouldn't include it. Because it's existence doesn't necessarily contradict canon mind you, but it's just like at this point, what purpose does it serve? Like Goku has Super Saiyan God and Ultra Instinct, even if I kept him being a kid, he would still have access to them. At least base God form, Blue would be too draining for Kiddie Goku but I don't think the others would be. Super Saiyan Four is probably my favourite thing to come out of GT but it just doesn't make sense in a canon world where Goku and Vegeta both have objectively better transformations available. But as for what I'd keep, the concepts. GT has great concepts, literally every saga has a fantastic concept. The first arc having them traveling across multiple planets in search of Dragon Balls is such a cool concept, because Dragon Ball has some great alien species, there's a lot you could do with different planets and species to make it interesting. The problem was the execution. Baby is a fantastic concept. His history with the Saiyans, he ability to possess people's bodies, such a cool concept. I found the arc to be slog and couldn't get through it. The problem was the execution. Super 17 is unsalvageable, terrible concept. The Shadow Dragons, enemies spawned from the overuse of the Dragon Ball where each tied to like a wish made throughout the series, probably the greatest concept you could think of to bring the Dragon Ball Saga to a close. But from what I saw, outside of some cool moments with Omega Shenron, the problem was the execution. Although shit, with the Super Dragon Balls that whole Shadow Dragon arc might not make sense anymore so I don't actually know if I could keep it. [/QUOTE]
Loading…
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Dragon Ball
Dragon Ball Universe
If they were to "redo" GT, what would you keep as canon?
Top
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…