Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Help
Smilies
BB Codes
Trophies
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Forums
Off Topic
Kame House
Feminism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ahill1" data-source="post: 54858" data-attributes="member: 246"><p>Women shouldn't be allowed to touch men's ass either... But why does the view is different when the roles are reversed? I'd argue because sexual assault on women is a more prevalent thing and a more recurring theme. Though the culture that a man who gets laids all weeks is the bam bam bam and the women who goes to bed many times is seen differently certainly affects the perception a lot... It's a damaging culture that leads to differing reactions. A 30 yo pretty teacher was having sex with her 13 years old male student... And was fired and prosecuted for exploring minors... Comments were filled with men saying "ohh I'd like a teacher like that, that boy was lucky". Genders were reversed, and whoever said that would be a huge fool. And whoever made those comments of lucky boy for having a teacher like that, are fools too, lots of them. But I don't think it comes merely from reverse abuse being turned a blind eye... It comes from men's perspective, too, that getting many laids is seen as a trophy. </p><p></p><p>As for yout last point, society's evolving understanding of gender roles and parenting has led to changes in how courts approach custody and financial settlements in divorce cases:</p><p></p><p>1 : Family courts generally prioritize the best interests of the children involved in divorce cases. While historically, mothers were often granted primary custody due to traditional caregiving roles, courts now aim to consider factors such as the children's well-being, parental involvement, and the ability to provide a stable environment. Joint custody arrangements are increasingly common, allowing both parents to share responsibilities.</p><p></p><p>2 : Financial settlements in divorces are determined based on various factors, including the financial contributions of each spouse during the marriage, earning capacities, and the standard of living established during the marriage. It's not inherently biased towards women; rather, it's aimed at achieving equitable outcomes based on the specific circumstances of each case.</p><p></p><p>3 : In recent years, there has been a shift towards more equitable custody and financial arrangements in divorces. Courts are increasingly considering shared parenting and the financial contributions of both spouses to the household when determining settlements</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ahill1, post: 54858, member: 246"] Women shouldn't be allowed to touch men's ass either... But why does the view is different when the roles are reversed? I'd argue because sexual assault on women is a more prevalent thing and a more recurring theme. Though the culture that a man who gets laids all weeks is the bam bam bam and the women who goes to bed many times is seen differently certainly affects the perception a lot... It's a damaging culture that leads to differing reactions. A 30 yo pretty teacher was having sex with her 13 years old male student... And was fired and prosecuted for exploring minors... Comments were filled with men saying "ohh I'd like a teacher like that, that boy was lucky". Genders were reversed, and whoever said that would be a huge fool. And whoever made those comments of lucky boy for having a teacher like that, are fools too, lots of them. But I don't think it comes merely from reverse abuse being turned a blind eye... It comes from men's perspective, too, that getting many laids is seen as a trophy. As for yout last point, society's evolving understanding of gender roles and parenting has led to changes in how courts approach custody and financial settlements in divorce cases: 1 : Family courts generally prioritize the best interests of the children involved in divorce cases. While historically, mothers were often granted primary custody due to traditional caregiving roles, courts now aim to consider factors such as the children's well-being, parental involvement, and the ability to provide a stable environment. Joint custody arrangements are increasingly common, allowing both parents to share responsibilities. 2 : Financial settlements in divorces are determined based on various factors, including the financial contributions of each spouse during the marriage, earning capacities, and the standard of living established during the marriage. It's not inherently biased towards women; rather, it's aimed at achieving equitable outcomes based on the specific circumstances of each case. 3 : In recent years, there has been a shift towards more equitable custody and financial arrangements in divorces. Courts are increasingly considering shared parenting and the financial contributions of both spouses to the household when determining settlements [/QUOTE]
Loading…
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Off Topic
Kame House
Feminism
Top
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…